
An Interview
with
Robert Dunbar
by Lisa Mannetti
In the late eighties, Robert
Dunbar’s first horror novel – THE PINES – made an incredible impact. Over the years, the book has developed
something of a cult following among horror fans, and THE PINES has just been
reissued in a limited hardback edition by Delirium Books. (A few months from now THE SHORE,
LISA MANNETTI: Rob, THE PINES was originally published in paperback
a long time ago. Do you want to talk
about what you’ve been up to since then?
ROBERT DUNBAR: Not really.
LM: Force yourself.
RD: You’re such a nag.
What? Were we married in some
previous incarnation? Can I still
collect alimony? Hang on while I channel
a dead attorney.
LM: Rob …
RD: Okay, okay. Let
me think. Well, my short stories –
mostly horror and fantasy and a few stabs at mystery – have pretty consistently
appeared in magazines, you know, places like City Slab and The Edge,
Dark Wisdom and Inhuman.
Where else? Bare Bone
recently. And Apex Digest. Plus non-genre publications like Descant
and Lodestar Quarterly, even the occasional anthology. And of course I’ve written articles and
feature stories for about a hundred different publications … but all writers do
that sort of thing. I imagine most
people would be more interested in my television work.
LM: How did you get started in that?
RD: Just about in the most roundabout way possible. When THE PINES came out … No, wait, let me
backup. I mean, I had grown up with the
legend of the Jersey Devil. Pretty much
everybody in the Mid-Atlantic area knows it, but before THE PINES no one had
ever done anything with the story. This
was before the comic book and that awful movie, even before the famous X-Files
episode. Anyway, when my book came
out, the press had a field day – there were stories and interviews, I was on
magazine covers, always with that “deer in headlights” look, you know?
LM: Yes, I’ve seen some of those.
RD: What?
LM: Never mind.
RD: Okay. Anyway, I
also did a lot of television shows. I
mean, we’re not talking Oprah here.
Mostly, they aired in timeslots calculated to compete with Farm
Report. Remember, Farm Report? Anyhow, I did a lot of these locally
produced, community-interest type shows, lots of weird little cable
programs. Hell, the Home Shopping
Network did a whole series of bits with me wandering around in the woods
telling horror stories. They ran them
for years.
LM: Do you remember the …?
RD: I remember once this friend of mine called in the middle
of the night to complain, “You’re on every goddamn channel!” So I flipped around, and sure enough there I
was on like three different stations simultaneously. Anyway, I made a lot of contacts doing those
shows, and I actually ended up with a few job offers. At this point I’ve written – what? – maybe
three hundred episodes of various cable and public television programs.
LM: Do you remember the first show you ever did?
RD: Never forget it.
Much as I might try. The
LM: The actress who played Stella – this is Karen Scioli
we’re talking about? You’ve worked with
her a lot since then, haven’t you?

BATS! crew Party: Set designer
Thom Bumblauskas, Scioli & Dunbar
RD: Oh, yeah, we became great friends. One of my favorite people to go martini hunting
with. I’ve written demented standup
routines for her, a couple of dinner theatre murder mysteries.
LM: What about BATS?
RD: I take back what I said before – BATS was the most fun
thing I ever did. We created that show
together. It begins in an old dark house
… revealed in flashes of lightning. And,
you know, winds howl, and doors creak, and this poor little waif prowls around
with a candle, looking increasingly terrified until somebody yells, “Cut!” Turns out she’s an actress in a film, and the
play follows her career, going in and out of her movies and her personal life,
which is just as macabre, until she becomes the Queen of Horror, or as she puts
it, “Ask anyone. I give great dread.”
LM:
The play did well for you?
RD: It’s had several productions, won a couple of very minor
theater awards, and gotten a lot of press attention. Actually, I have one great story about
rehearsing the play. May I tell it?
LM: Could I stop you?
RD: The
very first production of BATS, Karen and I had nothing to do with – we just
showed up on opening night. What an
experience! If you could have seen this
Wagnerian ingenue – reminiscent of one of the elephants in Fantasia –
stomping every wisp of wit out of the script …
We sat there paralyzed until Karen faked a coughing fit, and I helped
her down the aisle. Then we ran like
hell. I don’t think the producers ever
forgave us for not showing up at the cocktail party and press conference
afterwards, but we were in shock. We
knew we’d have to do the show ourselves.
But Karen hadn’t done live theatre in years, and she was very worried
about being able to project throughout an entire evening. I mean, the play makes serious vocal demands,
if only because the main character needs this deep, husky voice, very sort of
Marlene Dietrich/Tallulah Bankhead-esque.
Anyway, I remembered reading somewhere that John Huston had lowered
Lauren Bacall's voice by having her shout poetry into a high wind, which
resulted in that glorious husky purr of hers.
So I figured, okay. We’ll make
this work if it kills her. At about that
time, we had the opportunity to vacation at Greta Garbo's old summerhouse on
LM: And did it work?
RD: She was absolutely brilliant in the part and has
played it in several productions now.

Cover Art by Mike Bohatch
LM: Let’s get back to THE PINES.
RD: Whatever makes you happy.
LM: Thank you.
What …?
RD: I mean, this is all about you.
LM: Thank you. What
…?
RD: I mean …
LM: WHAT DO YOU FEEL IS SIGNIFICANT ABOUT THIS BOOK BEING
REISSUED?
RD: Well, you have to understand – no one has ever really
seen this book. Not the book I
wrote. I mean … the editor … well, let’s
just say whole passages ended up not making much sense.
LM:
What do you mean by that? Can you give us an example?
RD: Where
to start? We’re talking stylistic
devices. Okay. Say for instance, the heroine finds her
husband’s body on the ground, and I have her thinking, It’s not him. The reader understands it is him and her
thoughts represent desperate denial. But
if it’s rewritten without italics to read, “She stared down at the body. It wasn’t him.” The reader is simply left wondering, well,
then who the hell is it? May sound like
a small thing, but it happened on virtually every page. I’m breaking out in a sweat just thinking
about it. And there were bigger problems
too.
LM: Like?
RD:
What can I tell you? Do we have to get into this? Okay, just one more thing – then we have to
change the subject because I’m starting to get really agitated. My main character was African-American. I was halfway through the galleys before I
realized they had simply omitted all mention of her skin color, which of course
made psychological nonsense of her whole situation and … No,
don’t get me started. But come on now –
they edited her melanin? Excuse me? That’s not editing. That’s censorship. And it stinks.
LM: Did anybody else pick up on this?
RD:
You know, a few readers did come up
to me and ask if she was supposed to be black.
And a couple of critics even made remarks of the “Mr. Dunbar appears to
have been ill served by his editor” variety.
There are some very insightful people out there. Of course as a writer I’m just the tiniest
bit sensitive about this sort of thing.
I mean, getting your first novel published under any circumstances is a
blessing, and I was very grateful. But I
sweated blood making that text distinctive … then to see the book intentionally
‘dumbed down’ … well … you know how
protective writers are with their work.
Especially their firstborn. It
broke my heart. And it’s the main reason
I didn’t work in the genre again for years.
Still, enough of the manuscript must have survived, and a lot of people
loved it. Book reviewers in the horror
magazines were profoundly generous. For
a complete newcomer to find his work so praised – often on the same page as a
review for the new Clive Barker or Steven King – I was incredibly bowled
over. And the mainstream critics were
equally kind, calling the book things like a “masterpiece of literature” and a
“superb thriller.”
LM: You got some bad press too though, didn’t you?
RD: Oh God, yes. I
was roundly attacked by some of the
LM: Why do you think they reacted that way? You’d think they’d be pleased about the book.
RD: Well, you have to understand – the whole state has a
huge chip on its shoulder. Always has
had. I mean, the whole country makes fun
of it. But that’s not the only problem. Try to imagine if Bram Stoker had just
written “Dracula” today. How do you
think the local Carpathians would react to being depicted as a hotbed of
violence and superstition?
LM: Did THE PINES sell well?
RD: Depends on who you ask. Let’s just say the
LM: But it wasn’t your one chance, was it?
RD: Even then I knew that.
Or at least that’s what I kept telling myself. And look where we are now – the book has been
reissued in a gorgeous hardback edition.
And it’s been restored to my original version. Something I can be proud of. Finally.
And – maybe best of all – THE SHORE is also being released.
LM: Is this a reissue?
RD: Oh no! This is
being published for the first time. No
one has ever seen THE SHORE.
LM: Is it really a sequel or …?
RD: It’s a sequel.
LM: Might I possibly be allowed to finish a question?
RD: Could you talk faster?
I don’t usually go this long without a drink.
LM:
Did you get any other bad press?
RD: You mean besides this interview?
LM: I’ll ask the questions, please.
RD: Don’t be short with me, Lisa. I did have this one anti-fan.
LM: You had a what?
RD: An anti-fan.
This weird guy – very Religious Right Wacko sort of thing – went around
denouncing my book at conventions and stuff.
I loved it. He even had this
pamphlet printed up that accused me of being “abnormal.”
LM: He thought you were abnormal?
RD: Trust me. He
had no idea.

Dunbar reviews SF on television
LM: Now you’ve got me all confused. Where were we? Oh, THE PINES. Okay, so tell us. What is the Jersey Devil?
RD: Oh dear. There
are so many answers to that one. Well,
first of all, it’s the oldest oral myth tradition in
LM: Right. But what
is it?
RD: You want to hear the legend?
LM: Please.
RD: Okay. The
traditional version maintains the demon was born to a Mrs. Leeds … in a hut
deep within the woods. He was her
thirteenth child, and she didn’t want it.
Personally, I find it difficult to hold this against the old girl. But she cursed the unborn child, saying, “Let
it belong to the devil.” Actually, some
versions of the story have her saying that it did belong to the devil,
that it was the devil’s child. Keep in
mind this was years before the
LM: And what does it look like.
RD: That would be telling.
LM: And this is the basis for your novel?
RD: Oh no. Well …
yes and no. I mean, I use the fact that
the legend has existed for hundreds of years and that people totally believe in
it – I use that as the background for a far more complex and sophisticated
story.
LM: And do people still believe?
RD: Absolutely. No
question.
LM: How do you know?
Just exactly how did you go about researching the book?
RD: Well, aside from the obvious forms of research,
hunting down articles and monographs at various university libraries, I spent a
lot of time out in the woods. Several
times I got lost more or less on purpose, just to see where I wound up.
LM: You mean you went out alone?
RD: Well,
yeah. I wanted to be scared in the
woods, wanted to capture those feelings.
And I found some incredible places.
Ghost villages. Ruined
mansions. Bizarre wooded areas full of
quicksand and poisonous snakes. People
don’t realize how enormous the barrens are – that’s the amazing thing – but
it’s over a million acres. And I found
all these incredible little towns. I’d
start making sketches, turn on my tape recorder, and people would gather around
to see what I was up to. I felt like one
of the Brothers Grimm. Soon as they
heard I was collecting Leed’s Devil lore, out would come the stories. Everybody had seen it. Everybody.
Women became hysterical talking about how they’d been chased by it. Men told me about the time it tried to break
into their homes. There was no
question. They believed.
LM: And what do they call the people out there?
RD: Pineys.
LM: Pineys, right.
Speaking of bad press, they don’t have a very good reputation either, do
they?
RD: What do you mean either? Never mind.
No, pineys have always had a bad rep.
In fact the term ‘pineys’ was coined by a turn-of-the-century
anthropologist named Elizabeth Kite for a book about what she described as “the
mentally defective people of New Jersey.”
I mean, yikes. She described them
as being so cut off from the civilization around them that they might as well
have been the descendents of castaways.
And these are the people among whom the myth of the Leeds Devil was
born.

Dunbar soaks up atmosophere for The Shore
LM: So how is THE SHORE different from THE PINES?
RD: Well, THE PINES ends on a fairly apocalyptic
note. All blood and thunder. THE SHORE begins a couple of years later, in
the dead of winter, at a nearly deserted beach town on the outskirts of the
barrens. It’s very quiet. Very tense.
LM: Is it the same characters from THE PINES?
RD: The main character in THE SHORE is one of the main
characters in THE PINES, and several other characters from the earlier novel
get involved as well. But THE SHORE is a
very different book. Stylistically it’s
far more evolved. Of course. And the atmosphere is very different. Instead of a sweltering swamp, it’s set in a
stark, icy landscape. There’s nothing
quite so surreal as snow on a beach.
Unless it’s bloody footprints in the snow. But I think people who loved the first book
will find this one just as delicious.
END
©2006--Lisa Mannetti--The Chancery House--All Rights Reserved